LGOIMA Requests
Refine Search
Search results: 618
| Received | Subject | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30/01/2023 | Citizenship Ceremony Process | Complete | Details |
| 28/01/2023 | Dog attack statistics for 2021 and 2022 | Complete | Details |
| 25/01/2023 | Heritage NZ have a LGOIMA request, the response includes correspondence which includes MDC. Does MDC need anything redacted. | Complete | Details |
| 23/01/2023 | Can you please provide details regarding streetlights/luminaires (referred to as fixtures below) in your territorial authority (TA) | Complete | Details |
| 23/01/2023 | MDC funding for Settlers Day | Complete | Details |
| 23/01/2023 | MDC funding for Settlers Day | Complete | Details |
| 19/01/2023 | A copy of the end-of-year financial statement for the Manawatu District Council for the year 2022 | Complete | Details |
| 18/01/2023 | Details leading to and surrounding uplift of a dog | Complete | Details |
| 16/01/2023 | All details about the granting of funding to Kimbolton Settlers Day, including funding stream and members involved in fund allocation. | Complete | Details |
| 11/01/2023 | 2022 District Licensing Committee decisions | Complete | Details |
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2154
Date received: 30/01/2023
Requested information: Citizenship Ceremony Process
Status: Complete
Response:
Hello Alex,
Citizenships ceremonies are run by Council here in the Manawatu District,
The information you have requested is below.
| 29 Sep 2022 | 19 June 2021 | 21 Oct 2021 | 12 March 2020 |
Certificates issued | 15 | 9 | 17 | 14 |
Council staff attended | Record not kept as attendance is voluntary | Record not kept as attendance is voluntary | Record not kept as attendance is voluntary | Record not kept as attendance is voluntary |
Councillors attended | Record not kept as attendance is voluntary | Record not kept as attendance is voluntary | Record not kept as attendance is voluntary | Record not kept as attendance is voluntary |
Costs | $375.65 | $183.91 | $343.97
| $219.13 |
Location | Council Chambers, 135 Manchester Street, FEILDING | Council Chambers, 135 Manchester Street, FEILDING
| Council Chambers, 135 Manchester Street, FEILDING
| Council Chambers, 135 Manchester Street, FEILDING
|
Local or Central Govt staff | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL |
If you wish to discuss this decision with us, please feel free to contact the LGOIMA Response Team on 06 323 0000 or by replying to this email.
Warm regards,
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2153
Date received: 28/01/2023
Requested information: Dog attack statistics for 2021 and 2022
Status: Complete
Response:
2021
The total number of infringements under the Dog Control Act? 53
How many dog attacks (against animals or humans) have been reported to the Council? 58
How many of the reported dog attacks have resulted in a prosecution against the dog’s owner under s 57(1) of the Dog Control Act? 1
How many of those prosecutions have resulted in convictions under s 57(1)? 1
2022
The total number of infringements under the Dog Control Act? 176
How many dog attacks (against animals or humans) have been reported to the Council? 65
How many of the reported dog attacks have resulted in a prosecution against the dog’s owner under s 57(1) of the Dog Control Act? 1
How many of those prosecutions have resulted in convictions under s 57(1)? Ongoing
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2152
Date received: 25/01/2023
Requested information: Heritage NZ have a LGOIMA request, the response includes correspondence which includes MDC. Does MDC need anything redacted.
Status: Complete
Response:
Thankyou for seeking our input on the redaction of our correspondence included in your OIA request.
We are happy with what you have redacted and do not require anything further.
Warm regards,
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2149
Date received: 23/01/2023
Requested information: Can you please provide details regarding streetlights/luminaires (referred to as fixtures below) in your territorial authority (TA)
Status: Complete
Response:
Hello Ellen,
LG 2149 - Can you please provide details regarding streetlights/luminaires (referred to as fixtures below) in your territorial authority (TA)
I refer to your official information request dated 23 January 2023.
The information you have requested is below.
Can you please provide details regarding streetlights/luminaires (referred to as fixtures below) in your territorial authority (TA):
1. Has your territorial authority taken part in the NLTF funding scheme for the accelerated roll-out of LED road lighting? Yes
2a. How many fixtures are currently in place and owned by your territorial authority? (If it is known how many are owned by NZTA Waka Kotahi within your territorial authority please also separately provide this information?) MDC- 1920
b. How many of these fixtures (answer 2a) are LED? All of them
c. Of these LED fixtures, what was the year of installation? (Please provide number of fixtures installed in each calendar year)
2011 – 11
2013 - 13
2016 - 27
2017 - 893
2018 - 418
2019 - 76
2020 - 258
2021 – 223
2022 - 1
d. How many of these (a) are not yet LED and are currently scheduled to be retrofitted/replaced with LED in the future, and in which calendar year? Zero
e. How many of these (a) are not yet LED and are not currently scheduled for retrofitting/replacement with LED? Zero
f. How many additional fixtures are currently scheduled to be installed in your territorial authority (in addition to the current streetlights referred to in answer 2a, e.g., in new subdivisions), in which calendar year, and how many of these will be LED fixtures? Lighting plans are not done until subdivisions are granted, so this information is unavailable at this time.
3. How many TA owned fixtures of which CCT colour temperature are installed, specifically: All 4000k
a. What is the CCT colour temperature (e.g 3000K or 4000K) of the TA owned LED fixtures currently installed (referring to answer 2b)? All 4000k
b. What will be the CCT colour temperature of any future retrofitted TA owned LED fixtures (referring to answer 2d)? All 4000k
c. What will be the CCT colour temperature of any additional future TA owned LED fixtures (referring to answer 2f)? All 4000k
For questions 2a-c, if different colour temperatures are (to be) installed, please provide a breakdown of how many at which temperature (e.g., 20 fixtures at 3000K, 123 at 4000K). If colour temperature is determined by road categories, please provide details on the CCT by road type, and the number of streetlights per road type. All 4000k
4. How many of the current TA owned LED fixtures (answer 1b):
a) have central management system (CMS) technology? ALL
b) have wireless CMS technology? ALL
c) are being controlled using CMS beyond time-based on/off controls? (If any, please see question 4f) None
d) are control-enabled? (i.e., they are not currently controllable using CMS, but with an additional receptable will be) All
e) are not able to be retrofitted with CMS All can have CMS caps fitted
f) only for those being controlled by CMS currently (answer 4c), please specify the controlsettings and curfew timings (e.g., dimming to 50% intensity between 11pm and 6am; dimming to 50% intensity with motion-sensed brightening to 75% between 12am and 5am). For question 4f), if control settings are determined by road categories, please provide details on the settings by road type, and the number of streetlights per road type. None
5. How many of the future (retrofitted and additional) TA owned LED fixtures (answer 2d and 2f together):
a) will have central management system (CMS) technology? All
b) will have wireless CMS technology? All
c) will be controlled using CMS beyond time-based on/off controls? If any known controls, please specify (as per question 4f). None
If you wish to discuss this decision with us, please feel free to contact the LGOIMA Response Team on 06 323 0000 or by replying to this email.
Warm regards,
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2150
Date received: 23/01/2023
Requested information: MDC funding for Settlers Day
Status: Complete
Response:
1. Can the council confirm funding has been allocated to the ‘Settlers Day’ event?
The Kimbolton Community Committee made an application to the Manawatu District Council’s community Event Fund, seeking a contribution towards traffic management, PA system, and marketing.
The event was described as a range of old-style activities, a top town competition, a grand parade of cars and a children’s boat race that is free to the public.
2. If so, how much?
Council approved $1000 funding.
3. If so, why has the Council decided to support the event?
The application received satisfied the criteria of the Event Fund. Council looks favourably on applications that seek support for safety planning for events. In this case the Committee sought support towards the costs of a traffic management plan to ensure the physical safety of the public.
4. What other Waitangi Day events has the council allocated funding for?
No other applications were received from community organisations or Iwi for Waitangi Day commemorations in 2023. However, Council has provided $6000 (incl) GST towards the refurbishment of Te Hiri Marae near Halcombe, and the celebration of the refurbishment coincides with this upcoming Waitangi Day.
5. Has the council rejected any funding requests for Waitangi Day events from local iwi/marae? If so, please elaborate on the reasoning.
Please see above.LGOIMA Request Details: LG2151
Date received: 23/01/2023
Requested information: MDC funding for Settlers Day
Status: Complete
Response:
The Kimbolton Community Committee made an application to the Manawatū District Council’s community event fund, seeking a contribution towards traffic management, PA system, and marketing.
The event was described as a range of old-style activities, a top town competition, a grand parade of cars and a children’s boat race that is free to the public.
Council approved $1000 funding. The application did indicate that the event was to be held on the 6th of February.
As we understand, representatives from Ngāti Kauwhata and the Kimbolton Community Committee have met and have agreed a way forward together.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2148
Date received: 19/01/2023
Requested information: A copy of the end-of-year financial statement for the Manawatu District Council for the year 2022
Status: Complete
Response:
I refer to your official information request dated 19 January 2023.
The information you have requested is unavailable at this time due to delays with Audit NZ. At this stage there is no clear timeframe for when this will be completed.
You have the right to seek an investigation and review by the Ombudsman of this decision. Information about how to make a complaint is available at www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or freephone 0800 802 602.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2147
Date received: 18/01/2023
Requested information: Details leading to and surrounding uplift of a dog
Status: Complete
Response:
The answers are below.
1. The phone call (or any other method of reporting used) made to MDC on 17/1/23 that initially reported the dog to animal control
Phone call received from a resident at an address in Feilding to advise the following LARGE DOG, POSSIBLY DOBBERMAN, DARK BROWN WITH BLACK SPOTS ON CHEST HAS ARRIVED AT THE PROPERTY.FRIENDLY DOG. CRYING, LOST. NO COLLAR.
2. What time the initial contact to MDC was made by the informant
17th January 2023 at 11.39am
3. The informants name and any previous reports made to MDC relevant to the dog
Withheld pursuant to Section 7(2)(a) of the Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 – to protect the privacy of individual
4. Any other calls or follow up contact with the informant
No further contact with informant
5. The time and any notes in writing and/or electronic in relation to the uplift made by MDC and the animal control officer(s) - including the dogs uplift location
Animal control officer (ACO) received a call from MDC re a roaming dog described as a Doberman by caller, arrived at Accolade Street at approx. 1215pm where the ACO witnessed the dog rushing at two cats, a German short haired pointer not Doberman as described, dog was not people aggressive but cat aggressive. Dog uplifted from Accolade St. Dog was scanned by chip scanner, but no scan picked up, ACO felt this was unusual due to type of dog and location, possibly faulty chip or scanner. Search of the area on databases showed two possible owners with same breed and roughly same age as impounded dog, Generic messages left on both owners answer phones as ACO could not be certain the impounded dog belonged to them. Was also possible that the dog came from further afield as numerous dogs of this breed recorded.
6. How and at what time the dog’s owner was identified and contacted
As in Q.5 two possible owners identified but not confirmed until following day
7. The reason for the phone call on 17/1/23 at 12:38pm (from Gracie) to ***********
As in Q.5 phone calls made to two possible owners at this time in attempt to locate owner of dog impounded
8. What actions were taken on receipt of the phone call to 06 3230000 ‘MDC’ on 17/1/23 at 2:14pm from Gerwyn WOODS
Call taken by Call Centre operator, Operator did not know what the call was in relation to or that it referred to an impounded dog. Caller just stated was returning a call from a “Gracie” and did not know what it was about. The call operator was new, and it appears that an email was not sent to follow up with the ACO. ACO was off duty as on night shift.
9. Any attempts to return the dog to the registered owner or visits to the dogs registered address
Dog not able to be positively identified as belonging to a specific owner, 18/01/2023 another ACO using a different scanner identified a chip on the dog and located the owners name on database, at this same time the owner called through and spoke with ACO
10. Details of the return of the dog to the registered owner on 18/1/23
Following a call at 1027hrs 18/01/2023 the ACO was able to arrange to reunite dog to owner at no cost to the owner.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2146
Date received: 16/01/2023
Requested information: All details about the granting of funding to Kimbolton Settlers Day, including funding stream and members involved in fund allocation.
Status: Complete
Response:
Dear Colin,
LG 2146 - All details about the granting of funding to Kimbolton Settlers Day, including funding stream and members involved in fund allocation.
I refer to your official information request dated 17 January 2023.
The information you have requested is in the following link – LG_2146_Information_for_release.zip
You will notice some redactions of information which have been done under of the Local Government Official Information Act;
1. in order to protect the privacy of natural persons, Section 7(2)(a) or
2. May be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information, Section 7(2)(b)(ii) or
3. Because the information does not relate to your request
Regarding your request for information about the Members who ratified the funding allocation – because the funding was under $5000.00 it was not a requirement that these be put to Councillors (please see the information about Delegations included)
The decisions on this funding round were made by Janine Hawthorn, Community Wellbeing Manager and Lyn Daly, General Manager – Community.
With regards to your request for details of promotions by Feilding and District Promotions – as discussed, these details are not held by Council and you will need to approach them directly.
If you wish to discuss this decision with us, please feel free to contact the LGOIMA Response Team on 06 323 0000 or by replying to this email.
Warm regards,
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2145
Date received: 11/01/2023
Requested information: 2022 District Licensing Committee decisions
Status: Complete
Response:
I refer to your official information request dated 11 January 2023.
The information you have requested is below and in the attached spreadsheet.
Please advise the following for the year Jan-Dec 2022 in your territory:
1. How many new off-licence applications were approved? 2
2. How many new off-licence applications were objected to? 0
3. How many new off-licence applications were opposed by reporting agencies? 0
4. How many off-licence renewal applications were approved? 5
5. How many off-licence renewal applications were objected to? 0
6. How many off-licence renewal applications were opposed by reporting agencies? 0
7. How many new off-licence applications were declined? 0
8. How many new off-licence applications were withdrawn? 0
9. Please advise the business names and addresses which had new off-licence applications declined. N/A
10. How many off-licence renewal applications were declined? 0
11. How many off-licence renewal applications were withdrawn? 0
12. Please advise the business names and addresses which had off-licence renewal applications declined. N/A
13. How many new on-licence applications were approved? 4
14. How many new on-licence applications were objected to? 0
15. How many new on-licence applications were opposed by reporting agencies? 0
16. How many on-licence renewal applications were approved? 4
17. How many on-licence renewal applications were objected to? 0
18. How many on-licence renewal applications were opposed by reporting agencies? 0
19. How many new on-licence applications were declined? 0
20. How many new on-licence applications were withdrawn? 0
21. Please advise the business names and addresses which had new on-licence applications declined. N/A
22. How many on-licence renewal applications were declined? 0
23. How many on-licence renewal applications were withdrawn? 0
24. Please advise the business names and addresses which had on-licence renewal applications declined. N/A